Posted in Cross-writing, Writing craft

Cross-training, cross-writing, it’s all the same

I doubt if there is a person among us who hasn’t come across a magazine or newspaper article or online post on cross-training.  After all, we’re all obsessed with fitness these days – n’est-ce pas?  Not you? Even so, I’ll bet that you still have a pretty good idea about what cross-training is.  It’s that approach tofitness that involves a variety of training methods to improve your overall fitness level.  For example, if you usually run for its health benefits, by adding strength conditioning, you’ll improve your overall fitness level, which is likely to improve your running.  So, you already know this.  But have you ever thought that the same  approach might apply to your writing?

It doesn’t matter if most of your writing is on a blog, in magazines, in academic journals or even in your own personal journal, how you write matters.  How you write affects the way that both you and others understand your ideas.  As William Zinsser (whose book On Writing Well should be in your library) suggested, “Most people have no idea how badly they write.”

Go back and read some of your very earliest writing and you’ll quickly notice that if you’ve kept on with it, your writing today is so much better than it was when you started.   Your continual practice has, in fact, made you better.  But if you’ve gone a step further by actually working at improving your writing, it will jump off the page at you and scream: “I am better!”  One of the most under-appreciated approached to writing improvement in my view is the concept of cross-writing.

I’m not sure when I came up with or stumbled upon the idea, but it probably had something to do with a creativity course I taught a few years ago to a small group of third-year university students.  In that course we explored the idea of creativity cross-training: for example, if you’re a choreographer, then you could try a visual art such as photography or painting to keep the creative juices flowing – learn to see things in different ways.  This enhances your creativity.  The same holds true for writing.

I have great respect for authors who work in a particular specialty, but I’ll bet my next paycheck that most of them (if not all) do at least a bit of cross-writing even if they don’t cross-publish (not sure that’s a real concept for anyone but me). Many, if not most authors, keep journals in which they write a lot of material that they never intend for readers to see.  So, they cross write, too. But I’m talking about an even bigger commitment to this approach.

I’m talking to all you academic writers (including students) out there who don’t seem to think that your writing needs to improve – that it’s “good enough.”  But I think that taking the time to write a bit of fiction, to blog or even to keep a personal journal would help. You would improve your story-telling ability, and in spite of the parameters within which you must publish, at the heart of what you’re doing is telling the story of your research, or your theory, or your opinion.

I’m also talking to all those bloggers out there who free-associate in every blog post. I’m imploring you to take the time to do a bit of research for a change, and craft a piece that is more authoritative  I’m not necessarily suggesting that you post it on your blog – rather do it for yourself and your writing.

Perhaps all of this is to justify my own approach to writing:  a bit of academia, a bit of blogging, a few non-fiction trade books, a couple of textbooks, a bit of creative non-fiction (memoir) and, increasingly, works of fiction.  This apparent lack of focus on my part, I like to think of as evolutionary in terms of the quality of my own writing.  When I have the courage to open the pages of that first book I wrote  and really read, I am usually astounded that a publisher bought it.  My writing is better now, and gets better with every article and every book I write.  I don’t think you can ever stop improving.

What, then, are some of the skills that I learned by writing in one genre and was then able to use to improve another style?

  • First, I used to write feature articles.  One of the first things you have to be able to do (after gathering your material) to write a feature is to organize your material and write an outline.  That ability to think about how to tell a story has improved the way I’m able to write case studies in textbooks.
  • That ability to tell a story also became extraordinarily useful in writing the memoir.
  • The self-reflection skills that I had to engage to write the memoir became a key to opening up my imagination so that I could pick up on the rich possibilities of fiction that might come from an academic journal article (that’s the backstory about my upcoming book Grace Note which I’ll tell you about the minute I have it in my hand from the publisher).
  • My research skills that I honed by writing textbooks are the key to my ability to write historical fiction that is full of accurate historical detail.
  • And of course, all of the editors who have had a crack at my work have taught me some of the fine points of grammar, punctuation and style – even if I had to argue with them from time to time. In almost all cases, they won.

All of this makes me a writer who I think continues to improve, but one who has not yet arrived!

What parts of your current writing could be improved by trying out another form?


Reading, writing & publishing. Doing things differently.

One thought on “Cross-training, cross-writing, it’s all the same

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s