Posted in Publishing, Traditional Publishing

Finding that right publishing ‘fit’

publishing word cloudI am constantly amazed at the kinds of questions wannabe writers pose on online writing discussions.  The ones that appear with the most alarming frequency are related to finding/choosing a publisher for a book.  These are the kinds of basic questions that any serious writer would find the answers to after even a modicum of research.  And, in my view, they will find a lot more useful and accurate information if they do their own research.

For example: I’ve seen numerous newbie writers pose the question as follows: Should I self-publish or find a publisher?  What these posters need to understand before asking this question is the processes for each.  It is not a simple question with a simple black or white answer.  The sad truth is that for most of these posters, the answer will – of necessity – be self- publish because most of them wouldn’t be able to even find a publisher.

rejectionI am what my long-time readers will already know: a hybrid author.  In less polite terms, I’m what you might call a promiscuous writer.   Most of my books have been published by traditional publishers, relying on that old and often annoying query-submission-rejection-submission-rejection- until-you-find-the- right-fit process.  I have, however, also dabbled in the underbelly of the publishing world – vanity publishing – and recent self-publishing ventures.  I think that most writers today would really like to be published traditionally if they could, despite the moaning that goes on about losing control.  There is really something satisfying about receiving that letter or email from a publisher that says, “I’m delighted to let you know that we would like to publish your book…”  If nothing more it’s a bit of an endorsement for all that hard work.  At least one person (or the publish committee) actually liked it.

All of that being said, finding the right fit for your work requires a bit of work, as I’ve learned through the years.  And make no mistake, finding the right fit for going it alone also takes work to get it right.  This week, I’d like to suggest ways to find the right fit when you decide to go the traditional route.  These are processes that have actually worked for me.  Next week, I’ll take on finding the right route to self-publishing.

I’ve been published by a variety of publishers – types, sizes and countries (USA, Canada, UK), and along the way, I’ve learned a few things about finding that important right fit.  The first two steps I recommend are as follows:

  • Find a publisher that actually publishes in the genre that you want to pitch to them. This seems like a no-brainer to me. The very first time I wanted to sell a book to a publisher, I knew that it would be pointless to send it to a publisher with no interest in books about health-related topics. Publishers usually do make a statement on their web site (on the prospective author page) about what they do and do not publish.
  • Find a publisher whose books are targeted toward the same reader that yours is. And forget about writing to the publisher’s needs rather than the audience you intend for the book. When I first started writing, I was clearly focused on health-themed trade books. I had an idealized notion that I would “educate” the public about health issues, so I had to find a publisher whose books reflected that. I had to examine their current and back-list to see what they’d done before – because publishers are not likely to see your book as the one that pushes them toward a different audience.       If they only publish children’s books, then forget about your romance novel!

Now that you’ve narrowed your search and have a list of publishers whose list reflects the type and readership of your own material, you still have a few more steps before you can submit your work.

  • Research their submission requirements. This is very important. It is the packaging of your ideas and if it doesn’t conform to their particular guidelines, it means that they are likely to reject your work. If you’re submitting non-fiction, you’ll need to determine exactly what they’re looking for in terms of a book proposal – the format, content & length. Not all publishers want the same things, but all for them cover some important bases: Can you succinctly state the purpose and market for your book? What is it about? Why are you the right one to write it? How is it structured? What’s in each chapter? When will it be finished? How long will it be? If you’re submitting fiction, do they actually accept unagented books? How much of the novel do they want to see? If you send too much, they might not read it.
  • Make sure that your query conforms exactly to their requirements. This is a non-negotiable issue for unpublished writers. And, frankly, why would you not follow their guidelines in preparing your submission? It shows that you are professional, you are smart and you are interested enough in them as your potential publisher that you took the time to educate yourself about them.
  • Submit the query in precisely the method they prefer. Do they accept email submissions? If so, should it be an attachment or a query in the body of the email? Or must you fill out an online form? Must you send a hard copy? How many copies do they need? Do they want a self-addressed, stamped envelope for a response and/or return of the materials? When I first started writing and sending materials out to publishers, this latter approach was the only way they could be submitted. That meant making photocopies and sending large envelopes with folded envelopes inside and waiting months for a response in the mail. (Truth is you might still wait months even with an emailed submission.)
  • Send your query to the right person if at all possible. Do a little research and find out which of the editors actually acquires (and therefore presumably enjoys) the kind of material you are sending. Then you can address your query to the right individual which is far preferable to sending it to the info@ email address on the web site.

Navigating the road to the right publisher is often circuitous and time-consuming, but if this is where you’re headed, you just need to get started!

Posted in Writing, Writing craft

The disciplined writer: Keeping a promise to yourself

Our back deck beckons while I need to work on my new book.
Our back deck beckons while I need to work on my new book.

It’s summer.  The heat and humidity just beg us to take a cold drink outside and chill a bit.  And we deserve it, don’t we?  The problem is that without some self-discipline nothing will get done.  And I know that my two major writing projects that are currently underway will not write themselves!  So I’ve been thinking about discipline as an important tool for any writer’s tool box.

The truth is that when it comes to your writing, it is yours and yours alone.  From time to time you might be given an external point of reference such as a deadline – I’ve written about the beauty of a deadline before– but even then discipline for a writer means self-discipline.

Self-control. Self-restraint. Willpower. Regardless of what you call it, the concept is clear for your writing life: you need to be in control of your writing and motivate yourself to complete projects.  No one will do it for you.

One of the most serious problems with writerly self-discipline in the twenty-first century is the ever-present internet.  A quick Twitter and Google search will leave you with the impression that unknown writers spend much more time on social media sites than they do in their writing.  Social media is a serious time suck.

As you sit there in front of your computer screen attempting to get that writing project underway or finished, unless the ideas begin to flow immediately, there is a mighty temptation to surf over to Twitter or that writers’ group you’ve been meaning to comment in, or to Facebook to see who has posted something new on that page for aspiring authors.  You can delude yourself into thinking that it’s for your work, but what it really means is that you are singularly unable to discipline yourself to actually write.

Close your internet browser. Close your email.  Put your phone away so you can’t hear it if a text arrives.

Harry Truman once said, “If I want to be great I have to win victory over myself. ..self-discipline.”

This is so important to me as I make progress on those writing projects.  I made a promise to myself when I started each one: the promise that I’d have a finished manuscript in due course.  This is a promise I’m keeping to myself – summer or not!

Posted in Writing, Writing books

Maybe you shouldn’t be a writer

[Excerpted from Who Will Read Your Book?  The Unknown Writer’s Guide to the Realities of Writing & Publishing forthcoming from Patricia Parsons]

This is worth considering.  If you want to be a writer, and are considering who you are as a writer, it might be a useful exercise to consider all the reasons you shouldn’t write a book.  If you do this and at the end still believe that you should write your book and work to get it published, then you’ll be stronger as you move through the process.

Lots of people have put together lists of why you shouldn’t write. For example Susannah Breslin, writing in Forbes online, suggests the following three reasons you shouldn’t write: (1) you’re not good at it; (2) it’s too hard; and (3) it’s too hard to make money.[i] These are all valid points in my view. What’s so interesting is that in a later post, she says that her short piece on why you shouldn’t be a writer is the one that readers hated most.[ii]  It seems those who want to write a book don’t want to be told the reasons why they shouldn’t pursue it.  But you do need to hear this before you move forward.

Blogger Karen Yates has a few more ideas about why you shouldn’t write that book.  She suggests that you back away from that computer if (1) you want to write because you think it will be fun or easy; (2) you want to write because you have a lot of Twitter followers; (3) you think the topic is one you think you can sell even if you’re not passionate about it; (4) if you can’t take criticism (she says editorial: I think you need to have a thick skin in general); and/or (5) you’re not willing to promote your book.[iii] Again, these are all good considerations.

After a couple of decades of writing books myself, I’ve determined that people should write if they want to: what they shouldn’t necessarily do is publish.  If you want to write, remember that it will be a difficult process, but go ahead regardless of what anyone tells you.  Then take that manuscript and put it away to read in your dotage.  Don’t try to sell it to a publisher, and under no circumstances should you self-publish it. That is unless you remember the following which are my personal reasons that should give wannabe writers pause.

Do not publish your writing even one of the following statements applies to you:

  1. You’re writing as a form of catharsis. That’s what your private, personal journals are for.
  2. You’re writing because you’re angry about something. At least don’t publish anything until the anger subsides and you can look at the matter more objectively.
  3. You’re writing on a topic only because you think it will sell. If you are not passionate about it, it’s not worth writing about.
  4. You don’t believe that writers read. Any published writer worth his or her salt reads a lot and reads widely.
  5. You aren’t willing to do the research that will be necessary regardless of genre.
  6. You aren’t willing to work to continually improve your writing.
  7. You think that you’ll simply sit down in front of the computer and the words will flow.
  8. You can’t stand revising.
  9. You don’t have a thick skin.
  10. You spend more time talking to others in person and online about your writing than you do writing.

Once you have looked inward and can honestly say that none of these statements applies to you, it’s time to get on with finishing your book.

 

[i] Susannah Breslin.  Why you shouldn’t’ be a writer. Forbes online.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2012/06/12/why-you-shouldnt-be-a-writer/

[ii] Susannah Breslin. Why you should be a writer. Forbes online. http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2013/03/30/why-you-should-be-a-writer-2/

[iii] Karen Yates. 5 reasons you shouldn’t write that book.  http://goo.gl/S8L05l