Writing – Page 15 – Patricia J. Parsons

Maybe you shouldn’t be a writer

Posted on 15 Jul 2014 by Patricia J. Parsons

[Excerpted from Who Will Read Your Book? The Unknown Writer’s Guide to the Realities of Writing & Publishing forthcoming from Patricia Parsons]

This is worth considering. If you want to be a writer, and are considering who you are as a writer, it might be a useful exercise to consider all the reasons you shouldn’t write a book. If you do this and at the end still believe that you should write your book and work to get it published, then you’ll be stronger as you move through the process.

Lots of people have put together lists of why you shouldn’t write. For example Susannah Breslin, writing in Forbes online, suggests the following three reasons you shouldn’t write: (1) you’re not good at it; (2) it’s too hard; and (3) it’s too hard to make money.[i] These are all valid points in my view. What’s so interesting is that in a later post, she says that her short piece on why you shouldn’t be a writer is the one that readers hated most.[ii] It seems those who want to write a book don’t want to be told the reasons why they shouldn’t pursue it. But you do need to hear this before you move forward.

Blogger Karen Yates has a few more ideas about why you shouldn’t write that book. She suggests that you back away from that computer if (1) you want to write because you think it will be fun or easy; (2) you want to write because you have a lot of Twitter followers; (3) you think the topic is one you think you can sell even if you’re not passionate about it; (4) if you can’t take criticism (she says editorial: I think you need to have a thick skin in general); and/or (5) you’re not willing to promote your book.[iii] Again, these are all good considerations.

After a couple of decades of writing books myself, I’ve determined that people should write if they want to: what they shouldn’t necessarily do is publish. If you want to write, remember that it will be a difficult process, but go ahead regardless of what anyone tells you. Then take that manuscript and put it away to read in your dotage. Don’t try to sell it to a publisher, and under no circumstances should you self-publish it. That is unless you remember the following which are my personal reasons that should give wannabe writers pause.

Do not publish your writing even one of the following statements applies to you:

You’re writing as a form of catharsis. That’s what your private, personal journals are for.
You’re writing because you’re angry about something. At least don’t publish anything until the anger subsides and you can look at the matter more objectively.
You’re writing on a topic only because you think it will sell. If you are not passionate about it, it’s not worth writing about.
You don’t believe that writers read. Any published writer worth his or her salt reads a lot and reads widely.
You aren’t willing to do the research that will be necessary regardless of genre.
You aren’t willing to work to continually improve your writing.
You think that you’ll simply sit down in front of the computer and the words will flow.
You can’t stand revising.
You don’t have a thick skin.
You spend more time talking to others in person and online about your writing than you do writing.

Once you have looked inward and can honestly say that none of these statements applies to you, it’s time to get on with finishing your book.

[i] Susannah Breslin. Why you shouldn’t’ be a writer. Forbes online. http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2012/06/12/why-you-shouldnt-be-a-writer/

[ii] Susannah Breslin. Why you should be a writer. Forbes online. http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2013/03/30/why-you-should-be-a-writer-2/

[iii] Karen Yates. 5 reasons you shouldn’t write that book. http://goo.gl/S8L05l

Are you a writer or a ‘content creator’?

Posted on 4 Jun 2014 by Patricia J. Parsons

Content creation is the latest buzz-phrase of the social-media-obsessed marketing and public relations people among us. I’m going to suggest that large numbers of people who identify themselves as writers are not; rather they are content creators. Although there is nothing fundamentally wrong with being a content creator, it is disingenuous to suggest you are a writer, if you’re not. Let’s begin with some definitions for argument’s sake.

Wikipedia (arguably a good source for this definition since it is the mother of all content creation outputs) defines the concept as “the contribution of information to any media and most especially to digital media for an end-user/audience in specific contexts…”[1] [I added the emphasis.]

A more succinct definition is offered by the Pew Research Internet Project which simply suggests that content creation is “…the material people add to the online world.”[2] Further, they suggest that content creators make web sites, blog, post photos, contribute to online discussions, post materials to web sites etc.

What then is a writer? A writer writes. But, you might reasonably argue, a content creator also writes. Although that may be true, that does not make that person a ‘writer.’

Let’s look at an analogous situation: You are sipping a drink at a cocktail party and find yourself in conversation with someone whom you have just met. What do you talk about? Often, in these social circumstances, we ask, “What do you do?” This person says, “I’m a doctor.” What is the immediate image formed in your mind? That this person teaches Kantian ethics in a philosophy department of the local university? I doubt it. And that’s because in our North American society, the connotative definition of a “doctor” is that the person is a “medical doctor.” Although the philosophy professor might well hold a doctoral degree, it is unlikely he or she would say’ “I’m a doctor.” It would be misleading given our shared understanding of the connotative definition of the term. But what if that person says, “I’m a writer”?

Same scenario, different occupations. You are sipping a drink at a cocktail party and begin a conversation with a new acquaintance by asking, “What do you do?” That person says, “I’m a writer.” What image is conjured in your mind? Do you see a picture of this person toiling away in a cubicle coming up with pithy blog posts for a dog food company? Doubtful. Most of us would have a picture of someone who either writes for magazines or pens books of one sort or another. The person in the cubicle would more accurately be described as a “content creator.” So why is this important anyway?

In my view, writers do more than create content for a purpose – which is really what it’s all about in the PR and marketing circles (since I’ve been teaching PR and corporate communication strategy for a quarter of a century, I think I have the right to have an opinion on this). Content is written (or otherwise created as in the case of photos and infographics) for a specific audience for a specific purpose. That is different from a writer who has an idea, is passionate about it and moves ahead with writing the article, short-story or book – fiction or non-fiction. And if you are a content creator, please don’t pretend you are in the same situation – or have the same commitment to craft – as the struggling writers of the world.

So, I offer you the five tell-tale signs that you might actually be a content creator – and NOT really a writer.

You spend more time blogging, tweeting (or reading tweets), posting to Facebook, contributing to conversations on writers’ groups on LinkedIn etc. than you do on your private writing.
Every time you post on one of those aforementioned sites, you have a goal in mind: get more ‘likes,’ new followers, new friend, clicks through to the material you’d like them to buy/read.
You spend a lot of time thinking about how to find an idea that will ‘sell.’
You spend more time writing online reviews of other people’s books than you do on your writing in the hopes that they’ll someday review yours.
You don’t own a single reference book on writing process (grammar, style, punctuation, syntax, word choice, editing etc.)

Please don’t tell me you’re a writer – or pretend to be one in a writers’ group – if you’re really a content creator. That’s all.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_creation

[2] http://www.pewinternet.org/2004/02/29/content-creation-online-2/

Ideas generation, Writing

Books I wish I had written

Posted on 2 Apr 2014 by Patricia J. Parsons

Writers are usually avid readers. I suppose that it is expected of us, and possibly even required – although I’m certain that many of the classics were written by authors who did not read widely since there was so little to read (this is a theme I’ll get back to in a later post). I’ve given some thought before to the books that shape us as writers, but I’m still left wondering if others might be a little like me. Sometimes, when I come to the end of a book, I have a deep feeling that I wish I had written this book. It occurs to me that an examination of those books might provide insight into what we ought to be writing about – rather than simply always writing about what we think we should be writing about (or worse, only what sells).

I wish I had written…

Over-Dressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion by Elizabeth L. Cline. This book affected me even beyond my deep feeling that I wish I had written it. An important examination of an industry that affects all of us in one way or another, this book is one that needed to be written, and needs to be read. This feeling of a book that needs to be written, coupled with my interest in the subject matter were the factors that perhaps conspired to make me wish I had written it. The author, Elizabeth Cline is an American journalist whose commitment to the investigation of the North American penchant for disposable fashion resulted in a story that had my head spinning – although much of it did not come as a surprise – and I avoid disposable fashion like the plague, given my penchant for quality.

I wish I had written…

Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster by Dana Thomas. As I closed the cover of this book I had a very distinct feeling that it was one I should have written! A social history of the luxury goods industry, the book is also well-researched, lucidly written, informative and entertaining. The fact that it focuses on a topic that has been of interest to me since I started researching the marketing tactics of luxury goods manufacturers in my day job (don’t ask!) might also make it the kind of book that I would have liked to have written.

I wish I had written…

The Thoughtful Dresser: The Art of Adornment, the Pleasures of Shopping and Why Clothes Matter by Linda Grant (who is also a novelist). This book had me at the following statement on page 10:

“I consider it to be absolutely normal to care deeply about what we wear, and detest the puritan moralists who affect to despise fashion or those who love it. Who shrilly proclaim that only vain, foolish Barbie dolls, their brains addled by consumerism, would wear anything but sensible clothes made to last. As if appearances don’t matter when, most of the time, they are all we have to go on. Or sometimes all that is left in the ruins of life.”

This paragraph encapsulated for me the conundrum of my life as a professor and writer – and someone who has always enjoyed the fun of dressing. On a university campus, dressing fashionably is viewed in much the way Linda Grant describes. She nailed it. Oh how I would have loved to have written this book for my colleagues to read!

So, these books all do seem to have things in common. But what strikes me most is the fact that they are all non-fiction. I hope my inner writer is listening. I’ve been focusing my future writing on fiction – which I love to produce – and yet the books I wish I had written are all research-based, narrative non-fiction.

A few years ago during one of my many searches for an agent (two searches were successful; neither of them sold my manuscripts), one of them snottily said the following to me: “If I had a dime for every bona fide non-fiction writer who wanted to write fiction, I’d be rich.” Then she refused to represent any fiction I might produce. I guess I should have been happy to have been referred to as a bona fide non-fiction writer, which I suppose I am.

So I think I’m going to consider this analysis of my own reading interests. Don’t get me wrong, though, I love to read fiction. I just wonder how much of it I should be writing.